Your design can refer either to an improvement of an existing system or an entirely new system. Experience teaches that the former option is more feasible than the latter.
The system you choose to design could be placed in any organizational context - for example, a library, some of IU departments, a small business, a department of a larger video store, etc.
Your project can be broken down into following tasks:
You are to report about the whole project in a paper that is to be submitted on
the final day of class. The paper needs to contain:
1. A brief introduction on the project's
purpose;
2. A section on the organizational context that your system supports (e.g.,
goals/objectives, tasks/jobs supported, structure, etc.);
3. A section on users (e.g., educational background, information/computer
literacy, typical information needs);
4. A section on other parts of the existing system (data,
procedures, computer hardware, computer software);
5. A section on user requirements along with the description of your
understanding of the user context. It is a good idea to summarize
this section with a straightforward list of redesign
requirements;
6. A section describing the design you propose; Include sections on
Process, Logical and Data Modeling. Specifically, the following deliverables
should be attached:
7. A section briefly summarizing the whole report;
8. A bibliography section (if any); and
9. An appendix (if any).
Note that sections 5 and 6 are crucial, which may then be reflected in their
length.
No special recommendation could be given regarding the length of the paper,
although 20-40 pages seems reasonable for a project of this scope.
Formatting and grammatical features that characterize an academic paper are
assumed.
Grading Elements | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4.5 | 5 | Your Score |
Transcripts of interview | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
Notes from observations | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
Analysis of documents | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
Analyzed responses from questionnaires | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
Sets of forms, reports, job descriptions, and other documents (See Chapter 7, Page 204). Volume is not important here--a representative sample of each is fine. | Missing | 2 are missing | 1 is missing | One form, report, job description is present. In addition, | One form, report, job description is present. In addition, you supply me with the 'other document' | ||
Context data flow diagram | Missing | Complete but with more than 2 errors | Complete but with 1 or 2 errors | Complete | Clearly among the best in the class | ||
DFD's of current physical system, with a description of each DFD component. Volume is not important here--a representative sample is fine, but if the system you are designing is small enough, you can include everything. | Missing | Complete but with more than 2 errors | Complete but with 1 or 2 errors | Complete | Clearly among the best in the class | ||
DFDs of current logical system, with a description of each DFD component. Volume is not important here--a representative sample is fine, but if the system you are designing is small enough, you can include everything. | Missing | Complete but with more than 2 errors | Complete but with 1 or 2 errors | Complete | Clearly among the best in the class | ||
DFDs of new logical system, with a description of each DFD component (See Chapter 8, Page 239). Volume is not important here--a representative sample is fine, but if the system you are designing is small enough, you can include everything. | Missing | Complete but with more than 2 errors | Complete but with 1 or 2 errors | Complete | Clearly among the best in the class | ||
Structured Descriptions and diagrams that outline the logic contained within each DFD process as well as diagrams that show the temporal dimension of the system. In other words, when processes or events occur and how these events change the state of the system. (See Chapter 9, Page 283) Completing this for one DFD process is fine. | Missing | Complete but with more than 2 errors | Complete but with 1 or 2 errors | Complete | Clearly among the best in the class | ||
An E-R diagram (See Chapter 10, Page 308). Again, you need not do this for the entire system. Concentrate on a subset of the system. | Missing | Complete but with more than 2 errors | Complete but with 1 or 2 errors | Complete | Clearly among the best in the class | ||
Generate alternative design strategies for your system and select the best one (See Chapter 11, Page 351) | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
Create a Design spec for one form and one report in your system (See Chapter 13, Page 437) | Missing | Complete | Clearly among the best in the class | ||||
Create a Design spec for one Interface or dialogue (See Chapter 14, Page 462) | Missing | Complete | Clearly among the best in the class | ||||
Brief Introduction Section | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
Section on the organizational context that your system supports (e.g., goals/objectives, tasks/jobs supported, structure, etc.) | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
A section on users (e.g., educational background, information/computer literacy, typical information needs) | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
A section on other parts of the existing system (data, procedures, computer hardware, computer software) | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
A section on user requirements along with the description of your understanding of the user context. It is a good idea to summarize this section with a straightforward list of redesign requirements | Missing | Poorly worded and incomplete | Well worded but incomplete | Complete but poorly worded | Complete and well written | Clearly among the best in the class | |
Spelling/Grammar | Greater than 15 spelling and grammar errors | Between 10 and 15 spelling and grammar errors | Between 5 and 10 spelling and grammar errors | Between 2 and 5 spelling or grammar errors | 1 or 2 spelling or grammar errors | Perfect | |
Total Possible Points | 0 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 90 | 100 |